jazzpants
02-24-2006, 12:23 PM
Now that the ladies event is over... :twisted:
Bondo point was that it was a good thing that MK dropped out b/c she would have never beaten Emily. Well, obviously not a unhealthy MK, but I'd guessed that Bondo meant that a healthy MK would not finish behind Emily.
I had also posted that a Worlds 2004 MK would have beaten Emily at the Olympics this year based on the points alone. Keep in mind that the Worlds program was not adjusted for CoP. (It's too bad not many people know what MK's program had for this year either.) But I think the scores alone proves that MK had the potential to not only beat Emily but Kimmie as well. As for medal contention...that's a harder one. It depends on what was in her short and long program and how she would have skated. But I think MK would stand a good chance against the top 3. She's far from being that old "washed up" hag that a lot of people says should "Hang up the skates already." Far from it!
Too bad.... it would have been a very interesting Olympics this year!
Bondo point was that it was a good thing that MK dropped out b/c she would have never beaten Emily. Well, obviously not a unhealthy MK, but I'd guessed that Bondo meant that a healthy MK would not finish behind Emily.
I had also posted that a Worlds 2004 MK would have beaten Emily at the Olympics this year based on the points alone. Keep in mind that the Worlds program was not adjusted for CoP. (It's too bad not many people know what MK's program had for this year either.) But I think the scores alone proves that MK had the potential to not only beat Emily but Kimmie as well. As for medal contention...that's a harder one. It depends on what was in her short and long program and how she would have skated. But I think MK would stand a good chance against the top 3. She's far from being that old "washed up" hag that a lot of people says should "Hang up the skates already." Far from it!
Too bad.... it would have been a very interesting Olympics this year!