skatingforums.com  

Go Back   skatingforums.com > Figure Skating > On Ice - Skaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2010, 08:58 PM
daisies daisies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 683
Walley Jump Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandora View Post
What is different about this jump is that there is no weight transfer in the air. It is the only jump (besides inside axel) where the weight stays over the take off side.
There's no weight transfer in the air on a flip or lutz either, if you're doing them properly. There's also no weight transfer in the air on a walley.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:30 PM
vesperholly vesperholly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisies View Post
There's no weight transfer in the air on a flip or lutz either, if you're doing them properly. There's also no weight transfer in the air on a walley.
Well, there is kind of a backwards shift from left to right foot on the flip and lutz takeoffs. I think what Pandora means is that the entrance of a loop is the same as the takeoff foot, so you're jumping without the impetus of a toe pick or free leg action.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:15 PM
Pandora Pandora is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 200
Good point. On flip and lutz, weight transfer is actually on the ground (from edge to pick) not the air (so I probably should have just said weight transfer.) Good catch. However, on walley weight transfer is in the air from inside edge to outside edge (the jump actually "changes direction" in mid air as you throw it behind you). So, yeah, there's a nasty weight transfer in the air on the walley jump (which is probably one of the reasons why we rarely see them.)

Last edited by Pandora; 05-18-2010 at 11:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2010, 02:54 AM
daisies daisies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandora View Post
However, on walley weight transfer is in the air from inside edge to outside edge (the jump actually "changes direction" in mid air as you throw it behind you). So, yeah, there's a nasty weight transfer in the air on the walley jump (which is probably one of the reasons why we rarely see them.)
I disagree. You transfer weight by going from one side to the other. In a walley takeoff, you never have weight on the left side (assuming you jump CCW); you are mistaking riding a RBI edge for having your weight on your left side, and that's not correct -- at least it's not if the edge and jump are done properly. You still need to be over your right side to ride any right inside edge, otherwise you'll fall into the circle. (Similarly, if you're not over your right side on any right outside edge, you'll be on a flat or fall to the inside.)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:31 AM
Pandora Pandora is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 200
No. You jump off of the RBI edge (for CCW) that is why the walley is so hard becase you have to jump off the inside edge and "catch" it behind you and transfer the weight in the other direction so that it can land over the outside edge (otherwise you'd be doing a kind of "funky salchow" (with your feeleg behind you) in the wrong direction (CW) since you are taking off the the BI edge of your own landing foot.

Here is Yu-na Kim doing the walley. " target="_blank">http://<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2H9I9lugUk&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2H9I9lugUk&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

That takeoff is off the BI of the landing foot with means the weight has to transfer in the air. (That's why this jump is so nasty.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walley_jump

Oh I see what the problem is!! You are assuming that becuase the skater is on the right foot (CCW) she is automatically over the right side when she is jumping. Not so. In a true walley (done off the inside edge) the skater is actally jumping into a counter rotation (they are jumping the "wrong way" or CW, they need to transfer their direction to their own way (CCW) in the air. Like I said, nasty jump.

Last edited by Pandora; 05-19-2010 at 07:48 AM. Reason: Spelling
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2010, 11:40 AM
daisies daisies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 683
I know what a walley is. I have been doing them since 1980.

Counter-rotation and weight transfer are not the same thing. Nor are change of edge and weight transfer. A lutz is a counter-rotation jump, and, as we established earlier, there is no weight transfer in the air on a lutz. The same way a flip is a loop off the toe, a lutz is a walley off the toe. (It is. Think about it.)

The only difference with the walley is that the free leg is behind upon takeoff and not in front, and it's tricky to get the leg in front in the air -- but that's not the same as a weight transfer. Transfer weight to the left, and the left leg goes down, just like a scale; you can't hold a leg up and put weight on it at the same time.

(Anyone else find the participants of this argument ironic? )

BringMeToLife, I apologize for hijacking your thread!

Last edited by daisies; 05-19-2010 at 11:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2010, 12:35 PM
Pandora Pandora is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 200
Maybe we are just using different phrases. I use "weight transfer" for the counter rotation motion in the air from RBI to ROB edge. You don't use that term but stick with "counter rotation" because it is the same leg. But the fact remains that the weight "catches" and transfers from the left side to the right side. So if you want me to change the term from weight transfer to counter rotation in the air I'll do it for you. Because I like you so much!

And daisies please post walley. I'd love to study it. I can only do it off a flat. I can't seem to manage a real one off the inside edge. I'd like to study yours.

Last edited by Pandora; 05-19-2010 at 01:06 PM. Reason: Added stuff
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2010, 04:38 PM
daisies daisies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 683
Yes, we are definitely using different terminology. But to be clear, a change of edge, like RBI-RBO, isn't the same as a weight transfer. It's a shift in body position, but the weight stays on the same side. For instance, in a serpentine or paragraph figure, if you change from RBI to RBO, your weight doesn't shift to the left but your body position adjusts as you come up on your knee to make the change and then back down on the knee.

For a walley, the key actually is to not transfer your weight to the left. The counter-rotation will make you want to naturally do it, but you have be strong on the right and not let it go there.

I don't have DVD capability on my computer, so right now I can't convert any of my DVDs to post to YouTube. But I will ask a friend to help me out and hopefully I will get something up next week.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2010, 11:13 PM
Pandora Pandora is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 200
daisies,
I know we are hijacking the thread, (sorry Bringmetolife), but I'm so glad you are going to put up the video (if you can.) Thanks!! Seriously, (I'm not being sarcastic or anything.) I've always wanted to learn this jump but it is so hard for me to do. And no one at the rink does it so I can't see it done except on video. Walley has been on my "wish list" forever along with the open axel, delayed axel, russian split and tuck axel. (Well, ok, I realize the tuck axel is delusional.....but it is a wish list.) Thanks again. I mean it. (And even if you can't get up the video maybe I will take some vids of mine and post them so you can have a look. I'd love to finally get this jump!!)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-20-2010, 07:31 AM
RachelSk8er RachelSk8er is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the rink
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisies View Post
(Anyone else find the participants of this argument ironic? )


I was trying to get my wally but they were more like wonky, really bad loops because I'd change takeoff edge at the last second. My coach had me break it down with a really good drill to get the takeoff down. Basically you set up like you're doing a RBI counter, but rather than turning when you hit your axis, you jump off the inside edge and land forward. It really helped to get the feeling of not transferring your weight and using your counter-rotation. We haven't worked on them since March since we got so busy getting ready for ANs, must make a mental note to get back to that.
__________________
2010-2011 goals:
Pass Junior MIF test
Don't break anything
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-20-2010, 09:31 AM
sk8tmum sk8tmum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 495
sk8stuff.com has a description plus a video.

http://www.sk8stuff.com/f_recog/recog_j_walley.htm

My kid had the coach teach a walley just because the name sounded amusing ... sigh.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-20-2010, 09:42 AM
kayskate kayskate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 888
The walley is a tough one. I tried to get it several yrs ago. I had trouble jumping of an inside. At the last moment, I changed edges and did a loop. I tried 1/2 walleys also which are easier but did not translate into a full walley. However, the 1/2 walley method may work for someone else. It's worth a try.

Kay
__________________
Visit my figure skating journal
http://www.skatejournal.com/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-20-2010, 03:01 PM
daisies daisies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by RachelSk8er View Post
Basically you set up like you're doing a RBI counter, but rather than turning when you hit your axis, you jump off the inside edge and land forward.
That's a great exercise! A walley truly is a counter in the air. Where were your arms? For an RBI counter, I'd be leading with my left arm, but for a walley that arm should be in front and the right one back ... sort of like RBI rocker arms.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandora View Post
No one at the rink does it....
Probably because it's (sadly) worth nothing in IJS. It's a great transition but highly underappreciated. I used to do three in a row in a program, but in recent years I've only been doing them "solo" because more aren't worth the time they take.

Last edited by daisies; 05-20-2010 at 03:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-20-2010, 07:24 PM
doubletoe doubletoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisies View Post
Probably because it's (sadly) worth nothing in IJS. It's a great transition but highly underappreciated. I used to do three in a row in a program, but in recent years I've only been doing them "solo" because more aren't worth the time they take.
It really is too bad that IJS is geared towards the few skaters in the world who are doing triple jumps. Otherwise, I'll bet the walley would be given a value, probably at least 0.8. Have you ever seen a double walley? Stefan Lindemann used to do one in exhibition and it was just unbelievable. Now *that* is a hard jump!
__________________
"You don't have to put an age limit on your dreams." - Dara Torres, 41, after her 2nd medal at the 2008 Olympics
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-20-2010, 07:53 PM
kayskate kayskate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 888
I would love to see the clip of Lindemann's 2walley. If anyone has a link, please post.

If the walley is not given a value, that explains why we don't see them in competition. However, I wonder why skaters don't do triple walleys. That would have to be valued. I can't believe these are too hard for men who are doing quads and 3axels and hard 3-3 combos.

Kay
__________________
Visit my figure skating journal
http://www.skatejournal.com/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-20-2010, 08:23 PM
daisies daisies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayskate View Post
If the walley is not given a value, that explains why we don't see them in competition. However, I wonder why skaters don't do triple walleys. That would have to be valued.
You answered your own question: A single walley isn't given a value, and therefore a double and triple have no value. It's not a listed jump. I suppose if people started doing them as doubles and triples, the ISU would consider adding the walley to the list. But that will probably never happen, because who in the elite ranks will work on them? They're too busy trying to get full credit for was is listed!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-20-2010, 10:05 PM
coconut coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14
[QUOTE=daisies;416341]That's a great exercise! A walley truly is a counter in the air. Where were your arms? For an RBI counter, I'd be leading with my left arm, but for a walley that arm should be in front and the right one back ... sort of like RBI rocker arms.

When I pictured a counter in my mind, I always landed forward, like a counter exit. How do you do one full rotation? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-21-2010, 08:45 AM
RachelSk8er RachelSk8er is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the rink
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisies View Post
That's a great exercise! A walley truly is a counter in the air. Where were your arms? For an RBI counter, I'd be leading with my left arm, but for a walley that arm should be in front and the right one back ... sort of like RBI rocker arms.
Exactly, the arms are opposite. But your lower body is basically doing a counter but jumping the turn.

Must remember to do this tonight when I'm at the rink

I actually think I see more people doing walleys under IJS than in the past (when I say "past" I mean mid 80s-early 00s. If you go back and watch ooold skating videos they were pretty popular). It's not a jump, but if you can do them, they're great to put in footwork or transitions and show off without having a jump counted. There are a few teenagers at my rink who can single walley in both directions, they really use that to their advantage (one choreographer who works with a lot of the high level skaters at my rink has several of them who [assuming they are r-handed jumpers] will walley on the L foot, which puts them on a LBO edge to take off for a double lutz, walley-double toe walley is also another popular one). If it fits the music and the skater can do it will, it can factor into PCS scores.

Coaches seem to be teaching them again, whereas I never learned how to do one when I was learning to skate in the mid-80s.

I wonder if we will eventually see it count as a jump though, if a half loop is now being viewed as a jump. Along with other quirky things that are not technically jumps but can be used in the same way to link jump sequences and push the rules a bit (one footed sals, one footed axels, etc--which are the same concept as a half loop, they're a recognized jump of the full rotation landed on the wrong foot).
__________________
2010-2011 goals:
Pass Junior MIF test
Don't break anything

Last edited by RachelSk8er; 05-21-2010 at 08:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-21-2010, 12:28 PM
vesperholly vesperholly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
For those who do walleys, what kind of entrance do you practice? I'm intrigued by the "jumped counter" angle.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-21-2010, 01:11 PM
RachelSk8er RachelSk8er is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the rink
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by vesperholly View Post
For those who do walleys, what kind of entrance do you practice? I'm intrigued by the "jumped counter" angle.
I see a lot of people do them from power pulls, but if you're just learning, treating it like a jumped counter seems the best way to get it down (because they do feel very, very awkward when you first start doing them). Trying them from power pulls makes it really easy to delay the take-off too long until you've either flattened or completely changed edges, and at that point you're just doing a really bad loop. And if that happens in a program, that can have bad consequences (giving you too many loops and/or causing you to lose credit for an actual well-executed jump down the road). My coach and I started working on them back in Feburary with the goal of putting one in my program, but that's why we tabled it until after ANs--didn't want me to screw it up if it was bad when I already had the maximum number of jumps and used up all my loops.

Going the "set up like a RBI counter but jumping instead" route, you can do some nice footwork into it (and have the last step be something like a RBI double-3 to put you on that RBI edge where you need to be). Like RBO twizzle, change edge [without putting the free foot down], RBI double 3, ride that exit edge for a second, walley, double toe? That would be sweeeet. I'll keep dreaming (mostly about the double toe, although chances are I'll have that clean before my axel).
__________________
2010-2011 goals:
Pass Junior MIF test
Don't break anything

Last edited by RachelSk8er; 05-21-2010 at 01:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-21-2010, 07:38 PM
daisies daisies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by coconut View Post
When I pictured a counter in my mind, I always landed forward, like a counter exit. How do you do one full rotation? Thanks.
Yes, a back counter will bring you forward. I should have said the takeoff is a counter. I suppose the jump itself would be a BI counter and a FI 3-turn in the air.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vesperholly View Post
For those who do walleys, what kind of entrance do you practice? I'm intrigued by the "jumped counter" angle.
I do LFO 3-turn, step to RBI edge, then jump. I agree with RachelSk8er that power pulls are a bad way to learn. They take away all your momentum. I watch coaches teach that way all the time, and all I can do is shake my head.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-21-2010, 11:29 PM
sk8er1964 sk8er1964 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisies View Post
I do LFO 3-turn, step to RBI edge, then jump. I agree with RachelSk8er that power pulls are a bad way to learn. They take away all your momentum. I watch coaches teach that way all the time, and all I can do is shake my head.
I third this opinion. I just started doing them again myself.

I have been competition announcing the past two days. I've seen quite a few walleys in the intermediate through senior events
__________________
"The only place where success comes before work is in a dictionary." -- Vidal Sasson

"Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway." -- Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-23-2010, 10:03 AM
AgnesNitt AgnesNitt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 0
A CBC video (very pretty) of Don Jackson. There are what I think are walley's and a half walley at 3, 14 45, and 1540. Also at the very end 1630, what I guess are piston rolls.

Maybe we need a fixed thread with little video pointers to stuff you never see anymore: arabians, piston rolls, etc. Nobody does this stuff at my rink
__________________
Great forum quotes:
On Falling: '...it doesn't matter, it's what you do AFTER you fall that's more important' ISK8NYC
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-23-2010, 05:16 PM
kayskate kayskate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 888
I have started a page of links to interesting skating moves on my site. It is a work in progress, but feel free to visit and add your link ideas.
www.skatejournal.com/unique.html

Loved the Jackson vid! Plenty of great walleys there. Also love is blurred scratch spins. He stepped right out of one into a 2axel. it looked like part of the spin. Awesome! ~14:50

Kay
__________________
Visit my figure skating journal
http://www.skatejournal.com/
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-23-2010, 05:46 PM
RachelSk8er RachelSk8er is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the rink
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayskate View Post
I have started a page of links to interesting skating moves on my site. It is a work in progress, but feel free to visit and add your link ideas.
www.skatejournal.com/unique.html

Loved the Jackson vid! Plenty of great walleys there. Also love is blurred scratch spins. He stepped right out of one into a 2axel. it looked like part of the spin. Awesome! ~14:50

Kay
You need the video of Paula Smart's alternating ina bauers. I know I've seen it on facebook but didn't have any luck finding it on youtube.
__________________
2010-2011 goals:
Pass Junior MIF test
Don't break anything
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2005 skatingforums.com. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2002 Graphics by Dustin. May not be used without permission.
Posts may not be reproduced without the first obtaining the written consent of the poster.