skatingforums.com  

Go Back   skatingforums.com > Figure Skating > On Ice - Skaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2009, 04:08 AM
katz in boots katz in boots is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Under Down Under
Posts: 427
Does Thin = more Manueverable

I am wondering whether blade width affects manoevrability?
Sure, there are other factors, like rocker radius, parabolic, tapered ends, but I'm wondering about the width of the blade.

I always assumed blades were all the same width, until I got my Ultima Matrix Freestyles. I have found significant improvement in my footwork, though because I switched to Proflex hinged boots at the same time., I can never figure out what is to do with boot and what is to do with the blade. A comment in another thread about dance blades width got me wondering whether there is any advantage/disadvantage to having narrower blades.

When I have money, I plan to get Phantoms again, possibly Phantom Specials. I think they are wider than normal Phantoms, if anything they at least don't have the tapered end. Do these things make a difference?
__________________
Katz

Saved by Synchro!
I was over it, now I'm into it again !
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2009, 04:53 AM
Rusty Blades Rusty Blades is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,487
I noticed a number of improvements when I went to Proflex as well.

Width of blade should have little effect since blades don't vary all that much and just about everybody skates everything on an edge.

A narrower blade will require a smaller Radius of Hollow to feel as sharp as a wider blade.
__________________
Dianne
(A.O.S.S.? Got it BAD! )
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:52 PM
doubletoe doubletoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,062
On the other hand, dance blades are narrower, and my assumption has always been because that allows for quicker changes of edge and more maneuverability. Anyone?
I think the Phantom Special is actually tapered toward the back, just as the regular Phantom is. Not sure what that is supposed to do, though.
__________________
"You don't have to put an age limit on your dreams." - Dara Torres, 41, after her 2nd medal at the 2008 Olympics
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2009, 01:40 PM
hanca hanca is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubletoe View Post
On the other hand, dance blades are narrower, and my assumption has always been because that allows for quicker changes of edge and more maneuverability. Anyone?
I think the Phantom Special is actually tapered toward the back, just as the regular Phantom is. Not sure what that is supposed to do, though.
Yes, that's what I have heard too. Apparently (I haven't tried it myself so I am not speaking from my own experience) it is much easier to do all those three turns, brackets etc on dance blades, because they are thinner (narrower).

The Phantom blades are supposed to make edges easier, but I don't think they are as good as dance blades for all these turns. Saying that, I have Phantom parabolic and love them, but from what I heard,any dancing blade is better for turns than any freeskating blade.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-22-2009, 02:36 PM
mintypoppet mintypoppet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubletoe View Post
On the other hand, dance blades are narrower, and my assumption has always been because that allows for quicker changes of edge and more maneuverability. Anyone?
I'd agree with that. Someone once compared it to getting power steering, and that is exactly how it feels. I have both dance and free blades; my dance blades are faster, more maneuverable and generally feel less clumsy. I don't like spinning or jumping in them - they feel less stable and lack toepicks - but for general skating and footwork, I can do much more with far less effort. I can't blame the lack of toepicks or heel, so I assume that the width of the blade is responsible for this.
__________________
"Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction. They may be summed up by the phrases:
(1) It's completely impossible.
(2) It's possible, but it's not worth doing.
(3) I said it was a good idea all along."
- Arthur C Clarke
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-22-2009, 07:09 PM
dbny dbny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubletoe View Post
On the other hand, dance blades are narrower, and my assumption has always been because that allows for quicker changes of edge and more maneuverability.
Hockey blades are thinner for the same reason.
__________________
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus - and non-believers." Barak Obama, 44th President of the United States of America
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-22-2009, 07:21 PM
AgnesNitt AgnesNitt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 0
So what about rocker? I thought blades with a smaller rocker were easier turning than with a flatter rocker.
__________________
Great forum quotes:
On Falling: '...it doesn't matter, it's what you do AFTER you fall that's more important' ISK8NYC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-22-2009, 08:49 PM
dbny dbny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by AgnesNitt View Post
So what about rocker? I thought blades with a smaller rocker were easier turning than with a flatter rocker.
That's correct, and hockey blades, in general, have a smaller rocker than figure blades. That's also one reason the high level freestyle blades have a large rocker. It makes landing jumps easier.
__________________
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus - and non-believers." Barak Obama, 44th President of the United States of America
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-22-2009, 10:13 PM
doubletoe doubletoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by AgnesNitt View Post
So what about rocker? I thought blades with a smaller rocker were easier turning than with a flatter rocker.
That is true. The rounder the blade, the easier it is to get on the ball of the blade and turn. That's why you can't turn on speed skates, which are flat, and it's probably considerably harder to turn on hockey skates than figure skates, since they also have a 10-11' rocker (vs. 7' or 8' for figure skates).
__________________
"You don't have to put an age limit on your dreams." - Dara Torres, 41, after her 2nd medal at the 2008 Olympics
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-22-2009, 10:27 PM
dbny dbny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubletoe View Post
and it's probably considerably harder to turn on hockey skates than figure skates, since they also have a 10-11' rocker (vs. 7' or 8' for figure skates).
I just said the exact opposite. We can't both be right and I hate being wrong - so it must be you . Actually, as much as this hurts , according to the first two web sites I checked (site 1, site 2), you are right. Although, I also found out that the issue of rocker size and shape is much more complicated for hockey blades, and that the profile of the blades and the fact that they are curved at both ends accounts for the fast turns hockey players need. Their blades are maximized for fast maneuvering.
__________________
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus - and non-believers." Barak Obama, 44th President of the United States of America
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-23-2009, 03:22 AM
katz in boots katz in boots is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Under Down Under
Posts: 427
My Ultima Matrix Freestyles are significantly narrower than my old Phantoms.

Do free skating blades generally come in just the one width, or are they all standard apart from the Matrix blades?
__________________
Katz

Saved by Synchro!
I was over it, now I'm into it again !
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-23-2009, 12:27 PM
doubletoe doubletoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbny View Post
I just said the exact opposite. We can't both be right and I hate being wrong - so it must be you . Actually, as much as this hurts , according to the first two web sites I checked (site 1, site 2), you are right. Although, I also found out that the issue of rocker size and shape is much more complicated for hockey blades, and that the profile of the blades and the fact that they are curved at both ends accounts for the fast turns hockey players need. Their blades are maximized for fast maneuvering.
LOL! That's a good point about the hockey blades being curved at both the front and back. They must just use a completely different turning technique than we do (and I'm sure I would fall flat on my face on hockey skates because I would keep forgetting about the rounded front and back and the lack of toepicks! ).
__________________
"You don't have to put an age limit on your dreams." - Dara Torres, 41, after her 2nd medal at the 2008 Olympics
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-23-2009, 02:42 PM
ibreakhearts66 ibreakhearts66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 561
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubletoe View Post
LOL! That's a good point about the hockey blades being curved at both the front and back. They must just use a completely different turning technique than we do (and I'm sure I would fall flat on my face on hockey skates because I would keep forgetting about the rounded front and back and the lack of toepicks! ).
Yeah....first time I tried hockey skates, I was fine going forwards, mohawked to go backwards and slid off the front of the blades because of the lack of toepicks. Turning in hockey skates actually didn't feel THAT much different to me. I can do rockers and counters (not extremely well, but I can do them) in hockey skates. Although, thinking about it, I do believe I was turning further back on the blade than I would in figure skates, as if the turning sweet spot is more in the middle of the blade.
__________________
Youtube Videos
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-23-2009, 03:38 PM
doubletoe doubletoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibreakhearts66 View Post
Yeah....first time I tried hockey skates, I was fine going forwards, mohawked to go backwards and slid off the front of the blades because of the lack of toepicks. Turning in hockey skates actually didn't feel THAT much different to me. I can do rockers and counters (not extremely well, but I can do them) in hockey skates. Although, thinking about it, I do believe I was turning further back on the blade than I would in figure skates, as if the turning sweet spot is more in the middle of the blade.
Yep, that's one reason I hate rollerblades. I kept forgetting not to do mohawks in them. . . Got the worst hip bruise ever, then unconsciously did another mohawk and went right down on the same hip again!
__________________
"You don't have to put an age limit on your dreams." - Dara Torres, 41, after her 2nd medal at the 2008 Olympics
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2005 skatingforums.com. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2002 Graphics by Dustin. May not be used without permission.
Posts may not be reproduced without the first obtaining the written consent of the poster.