#1
|
|||
|
|||
Just a thought
Was working late yeasterday, had to miss skating and therefore was in a gloomy mood; then this wierd thought occured to me and lightened me up:
If MBA schools were teaching figure skating…. …. You would have paid $50K to have the likes of Tarasova, Carroll and Nicks to talk to you about the greatest skaters in history, their own coaching experience, the mechanics of jumps and spins, and what they like and dislike about today’s skating performances. You would have a few off-ice classes there they would put you on a lounge and ask to imitate an axel. You would watch endless tapes with skating performances and then have group discussions lasting way past midnight so you can produce a lengthy paper with a detailed critique. Then after two years of this rigorous training they would give you a pair of skates, put in front of a crowd and ask you to land a triple…. Anyone wants to have a go at "if computer programmers were teaching figure skating"?
__________________
My other car is a Zamboni Last edited by sceptique; 12-09-2005 at 04:50 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm. You're a little close to home here: I have an MBA and I've been a computer programmer, (still keep my hand in) but here goes:
If *BAD* computer programmers were teaching figure skating, many useless meetings would take place before any lessons were actually given. A 400-page document would be sent, outlining all of things the student didn't know yet. The student would (of course) be expected to pay extra to master those skills. In a program, unexpected falls would be tolerated, provided lots of cryptic messages were displayed afterwards. No skaters would submit program lists in advance or afterward for that matter. There would be no order to the elements and some maneuvers would be unique and "undocumented." Now, how about a school teacher teaching figure skating?
__________________
Isk8NYC
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If it was a major research institution, the study to learn figure skating would be stuck in the Institutional Review Board for a few months, then in contracts, then the FDA would call and have a 1/2 hour conference call on the skate's laces. By the time the study was approved the ice would have melted and everyone interested gone.
In one study we actually had a lenghty conference call with the FDA on rubber stoppers.
__________________
Recycle Love - Adopt a homeless pet |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I worked for the USDA back when they did home loans and closing on one person's loan was held up for 3 weeks because they couldn't agree whether or not it was ok that their handicap railing was off by 1/2 an inch (even though it met the state requirements)......ah, government bureaucracy!
__________________
Skate@Delaware Ah, show skating!!! I do it for the glitter! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Now, if I were to ponder what it would be like if education schools were teaching skating, well....it would sound a lot like sceptique's story, except the professors would probably require some specific type of skate that they would forget to tell you about until the last minute, b/c you were expected to discover that on your own by mindreading, apparently. You would have observers at your performances to evaluate your progress, and the observers would likely cancel at the last minute or just never show up, so that you would risk not getting credit. The skating instructors wouldn't actually teach you skills, but would quote theories to you from people who have researched skating w/o making a connection between the theories and what you are actually doing, and then you would later discover that the theories have actually been disproven by other researchers, but your instructors never told you this b/c the institution's philosophy keeps it in the headlines. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Like the judges who have never skated?
__________________
Recycle Love - Adopt a homeless pet |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|