skatingforums.com  

Go Back   skatingforums.com > Figure Skating > On Ice - Parents/Coaches

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 04-21-2009, 07:38 AM
Isk8NYC Isk8NYC is offline
Board Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Below the Mason-Dixon Line
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by sk8tmum View Post
(carefully placing my soap box BACK in the cupboard under the stairs )
I didn't know we had stairs here. Is Daniel Radcliffe thereabouts? lol j/k

I understood what CoachPA meant, that her student was testing MITF but not competing in the low-level freestyle.

Freestyle's not for everyone. I knew several teens who were pretty high up in MITF because it made them stronger in synchro and dance.
__________________
Isk8NYC
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-21-2009, 09:53 AM
momof3chicks momof3chicks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schmeck View Post
I agree, and here's my input:

My daughter competed in synchro for many years - she's passed her junior MITF, just told me her coach wants her to test her senior MITF this summer, is working on Bronze dances (just started testing ice dance this past year or so?), and has only taken her pre-pre freestyle test. Yes, she's very lopsided that way, but was recruited by colleges for her synchro, got into MIT because of her skating/synchro (along with awesome grades/SAT, but it was the synchro that clinched it) and can't do an axel. Actually, she won't try one, they scare her she says! She can almost land a double flip (flip is her best jump, huge and high) but she's a tall girl for figure skating, and didn't start skating seriously until she was 12 yrs old.

I want her to test some freestyle, but she refuses. She's a clockwise spinner, and had to learn to jump and spin the "other way" for synchro, so her spins are pretty weak. I think she'd get the jumps called (either direction) before her spins. Right now she's just mixed up on which way is her 'strong' way!

I sometimes regret that we started her off in gymnastics when she was 5. She didn't have a group skating lesson until she was 8, or a private lesson until she was almost 13. She's 17 now, and has done so much in only 4-5 years.
Hey, I think synchro is GREAT! My 8 yo is still spanning both worlds, she too is a tall girl. Her 14 yo sister is 6 fto 2 inches tall, so I am a bit worried about the younger getting like that and how it will affect this sport she so loves.

I have her in both on purpose- only very few are very successful in freestyle, but she is already a fantastic synchro skater and can keep going with that if freestyle doesn't turn out to be for her
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-21-2009, 10:10 AM
blue111moon blue111moon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wormtown, MA
Posts: 241
To answer the original thread-starting question, the reason there are axel and no-axel divisions in Pre Pre competitions is because, before USFS instituted the Well-Balanced Program requirements, they decided to allow axels in Pre Pre competitions as the highest jump allowed. (Note: there was a storm of protest about this but to no avil.)

At the time there were a lot of skaters who'd already tested Pre Pre moves and Free who didn't have axels who felt they were being shut out of Pre Pre because of that. So organizers of local comps split the Pre Pre group into axel and no axel to level out the playing field a little.

There are also some competitions that split Preliminary along similar lines or even into three groups: no axel no doubles, axel but no doubles and the standard Prelim that allows axels and up to two doubles. It's all to give skaters at those most common levels places to compete against their peers.

At the competitions who do split the levels, the judges are generally instructed to take deductions if skaters perform elements that are not allowed in that group. The problem there is that a skater who does an axel in a no-axel group generally has enough skills to make up for the points deducted and can still medal, which doesn't seem fair to the skaters who followed the rules.

Hard-nose that I am, I've lobbied that skaters who do elements expressly forbidden should be disqualified or placed last no matter how good the rest of their skating is, but I've been told that that's too harsh and will most likely emotionally scar the child for life.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-21-2009, 10:24 AM
Isk8NYC Isk8NYC is offline
Board Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Below the Mason-Dixon Line
Posts: 0
I think that if you do an axel in an event where the title actually SAYS "NO AXELS" you're okay DQ'ing them, lol.

A penalty is enough for other instances where they do something that's above the restricted level. I'm thinking of Basic Skills skaters though - they're working on a flip during lessons, but their program only has a half-flip ...oops... they did a single by mistake.
__________________
Isk8NYC
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-21-2009, 10:37 AM
FSWer FSWer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by jskater49 View Post
There are more and more coaches not letting kids test pre-pre until they have an axel. WHich I think is a darn shame.

Usually at that level the axels are cheated and sloppy and I think kids with good skating skills have a chance without an axel. It's a big deal to pass your first USFS free skating test and I don't think kids should have to have to wait until they have an axel to go for that honor.

But I'm in the minority.

Joelle

Ok...I'm not sure I'm actually following. But I'll put in my input. As far as kids and other skaters needing an Axel (or for that matter ANYTHING) to move up. I think they should also be looking at how GIFTED each kid is. If a kid is not even gifted enough (or for that matter not even CAPABLE at all to even ever DO an Axel. Or any other move. Then they should be just moving them up for what they CAN do at that time,and if the kid or skater get's an Axel or any other move in the long-run. Let them get it at their own pace. Just like everyone else...so skaters learn quicker then others. Some may never learn moves. BTW. what's the difference between Pre and Pre-Pre?
__________________
FSWer
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:23 AM
Isk8NYC Isk8NYC is offline
Board Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Below the Mason-Dixon Line
Posts: 0
Pre-Prel MITF:
Forward Perimeter Stroking
Basic Consecutive Edges
Forward Right and Left Spirals
Waltz Eight

Prel MITF:
Forward and Backward Crossovers - Circles
Consecutive Inside and Outside Spirals
Forward Power Threes
Alternating Forward 3-Turns
Alternating Backward Crossovers to Backward Outside Edges

Pre-Prel Freestyle:
Waltz Jump
Salchow
Toe Loop
1/2 Flip
1/2 Lutz
1 Foot Spin

Prel Freestyle: (1:30 Program Required)
Waltz Jump
Salchow
Loop
Flip
Waltz Jump-Toe Loop / Jump Combination
1 ft Upright spin
1 ft Backspin
Sit Spin
Connecting Steps and Extras
__________________
Isk8NYC
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:29 AM
Skittl1321 Skittl1321 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,994
Thanks for posting that. I thought that pre-pre needed higher jumps than that. I thought the half jumps were all required as singles for the test.
__________________
-Jessi
What I need is a montage...
Visit my skating journal or my Youtube videos (updated with 2 new videos Sept 26, 2009)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-21-2009, 12:49 PM
momof3chicks momof3chicks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isk8NYC View Post
I think that if you do an axel in an event where the title actually SAYS "NO AXELS" you're okay DQ'ing them, lol.

A penalty is enough for other instances where they do something that's above the restricted level. I'm thinking of Basic Skills skaters though - they're working on a flip during lessons, but their program only has a half-flip ...oops... they did a single by mistake.
My 9 yo was the victim of this issue in the new test track. She did beginner- where only upright spins, certain combinations and half jumps and salchows ONLY allowed. There were several girls who did more- camel spins, sit spins, illegal jump combinations (loops etc). and my dd ended up 7th out of 8 even with a very very good clean skate. Some of the judges even placed the kids doing that stuff in 1st place.

My dd was very upset about how that played out and rightly so.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-21-2009, 01:08 PM
Isk8NYC Isk8NYC is offline
Board Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Below the Mason-Dixon Line
Posts: 0
I understand what you're saying, but I meant students making an honest mistake in the LTS levels. I wasn't referring to the Test Track events.
__________________
Isk8NYC
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-21-2009, 03:03 PM
momof3chicks momof3chicks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isk8NYC View Post
I understand what you're saying, but I meant students making an honest mistake in the LTS levels. I wasn't referring to the Test Track events.
I understood that, these were definitely events where the coaches must not have known I guess. Also, I think that the fact that each competition seems to be able to adjust the rules makes it challenging for all
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
competitions, pre-preliminary freeskate

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2005 skatingforums.com. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2002 Graphics by Dustin. May not be used without permission.
Posts may not be reproduced without the first obtaining the written consent of the poster.