dooobedooo
02-27-2004, 08:10 PM
There is a long thread elsewhere regarding a 60-ish coach and his indecent proposal to a 17-year-old male pupil. There is a pending court action against the coach, which if he is found guilty, could lead to a prison sentence and/or being forbidden to work with children.
I have known heterosexual involvements occur between coaches and their younger pupils, and I wonder what people regard as an appropriate dividing line between what is - and is not - acceptable.
For doctors, there is a saying: "You can make a mistress of your patient, but not a patient of your mistress": ie. ANY sexual liaison arising from doctor/patient acquaintance is unacceptable, and may get the doctor banned from practising.
But in universities, liaisons between students of 18-plus and their much older lecturers are quite common.
What do parents/coaches/skaters think? Where is an acceptable dividing line, taking age/gender/relationship into account? Have you ever been involved in a tricky situation like this?
I have known heterosexual involvements occur between coaches and their younger pupils, and I wonder what people regard as an appropriate dividing line between what is - and is not - acceptable.
For doctors, there is a saying: "You can make a mistress of your patient, but not a patient of your mistress": ie. ANY sexual liaison arising from doctor/patient acquaintance is unacceptable, and may get the doctor banned from practising.
But in universities, liaisons between students of 18-plus and their much older lecturers are quite common.
What do parents/coaches/skaters think? Where is an acceptable dividing line, taking age/gender/relationship into account? Have you ever been involved in a tricky situation like this?